<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of Focus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/27/the-death-of-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/27/the-death-of-focus/</link>
	<description>Liberalism and general burblings</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #71 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/27/the-death-of-focus/#comment-31802</link>
		<dc:creator>Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #71 &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-31802</guid>
		<description>[...] The death of Focus? on Tristan Mills’ Liberty Alone blog. The age-old election agent’s question: how many leaflets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The death of Focus? on Tristan Mills’ Liberty Alone blog. The age-old election agent’s question: how many leaflets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinter</title>
		<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/27/the-death-of-focus/#comment-31700</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-31700</guid>
		<description>Well, we will always bombard at by-elections- and our successes at by-elections even just a few years ago owed a lot to this, no mistake. However, I think there is much more of a place for more targetted campaigning (i.e letters) that has a much higher rate of being read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we will always bombard at by-elections- and our successes at by-elections even just a few years ago owed a lot to this, no mistake. However, I think there is much more of a place for more targetted campaigning (i.e letters) that has a much higher rate of being read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
