<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radical liberals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/03/radical-liberals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/03/radical-liberals/</link>
	<description>Liberalism and general burblings</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Петр</title>
		<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/03/radical-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-33794</link>
		<dc:creator>Петр</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/?p=517#comment-33794</guid>
		<description>Вот пришел леха и вместо того чтобы сказать что-то усное начал тупо жрать :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Вот пришел леха и вместо того чтобы сказать что-то усное начал тупо жрать :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miller 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/03/radical-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-30820</link>
		<dc:creator>Miller 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/?p=517#comment-30820</guid>
		<description>I think most socialists also consider themselves to be within the same tradition of said radical liberals, but consider socialism(s) as a historically necessary development on that.

It's the rest of liberalism that gives me troubles. http://newerlabour.blogspot.com/2007/12/about-liberalism.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most socialists also consider themselves to be within the same tradition of said radical liberals, but consider socialism(s) as a historically necessary development on that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the rest of liberalism that gives me troubles. <a href="http://newerlabour.blogspot.com/2007/12/about-liberalism.html"  rel="nofollow">http://newerlabour.blogspot.com/2007/12/about-liberalism.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jock</title>
		<link>http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/2008/06/03/radical-liberals/comment-page-1/#comment-30816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eridu.org.uk/blog/?p=517#comment-30816</guid>
		<description>...which is an interesting point given the earlier posting about democracy and revoilution.  There can be no doubt that, though perhaps the Diggers only made an ideological contribution, Cobden, through the National Liberal Land Company radically changed our democracy by the "back door".

Can we find such a "back door" today I wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;which is an interesting point given the earlier posting about democracy and revoilution.  There can be no doubt that, though perhaps the Diggers only made an ideological contribution, Cobden, through the National Liberal Land Company radically changed our democracy by the &#8220;back door&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can we find such a &#8220;back door&#8221; today I wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
