Fascists are left wing:
That is for a certain definition of left-wing which is based on left-wing meaning socialist and anti free-market.
Just more of the absurdity and idiocy of these broad political labels which allow people sharing similar opinions being on different wings of the political spectrum…
Of course, if we take the political compass of left-right economics and authoritarian-libertarian socially, fascism and communism would coincide, they just differ on what differentiates people and what determines their actions - communists take class, fascists take race, blood or nationality…
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


November 20th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Very fair point.
I suspect that most of the time, when we use terms like “right wing” or “left wing”, we don’t use them with any kind of rigorous or academic meaning, but simply because of the sort of vibe they give off. It’s a lazy and sloppy way of debating.
So often, political opponents brand Lib Dems as being all over the place, because they try to analyse Lib Dem policy on a left-right scale, rather than judging it against more suitable criteria. If we use terms like “left” and “right” ourselves, we give people an open invitation to misrepresent us. Both words are probably best avoided entirely.
PS. Could you delete the above comment? For some reason, it links to University of Oxford Webmail, rather than linking back to my blog. Blame Firefox!
November 20th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
“Of course, if we take the political compass…”
Political Compass is actually a very cheap copy of the original two-dimensional political test, World’s Smallest Political Quiz, but Political Compass is made by people who aren’t actually understanging what they are measuring. Therefore they have also incorporated elements from The F Scale which is supposed to measure how authoritarian personality a person has by asking questions about whether one believes in astrology or not and about one’s taste in arts, but which isn’t really scientific, either.
Beside the original World’s Smallest Political Quiz I could recommend two variations of it, World’s Enhanced Precision Political Quiz and Politopia Quiz. (Unfortunately all of these three tests are using American political vocabulary.)
November 20th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
Well I would tend to agree: after all Mussolini had been a leading Socialist journalist, even as late as 1917, only five years before he came to power. As for Hitler, well the clue might be in the name: National Socialist.
That being said, I am noe too keen on being named right wing or left wing. I am an anti authoritarian Liberal.
November 21st, 2007 at 11:09 am
Tristan, I wonder if you by mistake deleted the wrong message. Jonny Wright asked to delete his first message, but you seem to have deleted mine. I didn’t think it was that offensive.
November 22nd, 2007 at 2:51 pm
The two extremes meet up somewhere round the back, yes. If there is no freedom, and no democractic institutions, it doesn’t matter whose interests or what ideology a government claims to represent, the character is much the same.
The left wing is right wing and vice versa. Nice.
November 22nd, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Hmm, I think I’d disagree, under your definition of the terms left and right wing you are quite correct in pointing out that fascists were anti free market (pro private corporation and state working together as one) and you are thus correct under your terms. But I believe left and right wing can be seen more in terms of sympathies and where those sympathies lie rather than in differing methods such as whether they are free market or corporatist. For instance the sympathies of communism lie with the proletariat (although in practise it only truly favours the bureaucrat) while the sympathies of fascism lie with those in traditional authority such as monarchy, church and state (although mainly the state as this tended to be turned into both a religious and monarchical organisation). My view of left and right is not so much based on your well defined methods but on which people those methods are aimed at helping, whether it is aimed at creating equality and fraternity in society or class and hierarchy. Under those definitions which I find portray the left and right far more accurately fascism is a thoroughly right wing ideology. It also shows why the old classical liberals of the 19th and 18th century were relatively left wing while the protectionist tories were right wing for surely under your definition the oppossite would be true.
P.S. Hitler was a National Socialist rather than a Fascist, they are different ideologies although rather similar.
November 22nd, 2007 at 11:29 pm
Anonymous - I’ve only just got to a computer being off in the US for a bit. Your comment was waiting in the moderation queue and has been put up now.
November 23rd, 2007 at 12:43 am
[...] on from a post by Tristan Mills and a follow up by John Dixon I thought I’d offer my own perspective on the question [...]
November 23rd, 2007 at 1:17 pm
“left-right” is by its own definition one-dimensional and not helpful at all.
Authoritarian-Liberal is another axis, as is economic and personal/social.
Those of the Left more often as not, when you scratch the surface, end up with rather authoritarian views and some even call it “liberal”!
November 23rd, 2007 at 8:53 pm
Dividing opinion into any simplistic left/centre/right axis really depends on the question being asked at that moment. It is then used as the basis for extrapolation to manipulate people into creating associations between issues which don’t necessarily exist, because an assumption is made that the original questions are formulated from some external and objective political position.
As such using the description left/right/centre deemphasises and deprioritises the founding principles of individual opinion and obscures far more than it reveals.
The use of generalised left/centre/right descriptions is paradoxically and fundamentally illiberal.
November 24th, 2007 at 12:20 am
Many also support greater personal freedom for all, though I think that’s because they’re too stupid to know what they’re doing.