Liberty Alone

I am a firm supporter of a voucher system in education as a solution to the current dire state of this country’s education system.
The current system whilst it has its success stories fails drastically too much, despite the best efforts of all involved. This is not due to evil intent, but due to fundamental flaws in the system as a whole.

Voucher systems however are opposed at all turns by people, despite evidence from countries like Sweden that they work very well.

I am going to concentrate on one of the most illogical objections - that it will help rich people most:

Consider a private school which charges £4000 a year to educate a child.
Under this voucher system the state gives each child £3000 to spend on their education. That brings the amount to pay down to £1000 a year making it far more affordable enabling a greater selection of society to attend, to the benefit of all.

Now, you may say what about those who cannot afford the £1000?
Well, the vast majority of schools are concerned with education and want to give the best education they can to those who will benefit. To this end many private schools have scholarship funds to provide that education to those who cannot afford it but who would benefit.
Say our school has one scholarship fund which is worth £4000 a year. Without vouchers there is enough for one pupil a year to benefit. With vouchers there is enough for 4 pupils to benefit. Clearly a good thing.

A clever school might also realise that the rich who are paying less would pay a bit more for the education, so they could charge a total of £4500 a year leaving parents to pay £1500 a year. That means that they make a profit of £500 per year per pupil. So two pupils paying that rate will fund a scholarship for another pupil.

Other effects may also come into play. If wealthy parents are paying less, then they will be more inclined to give donations or support activities at the school meaning the school can raise even more money to be spent on education.

I think I have demonstrated that all benefit, with poorer people benefiting even more. True, the rich pay less and benefit from tax money, but that is money they’ve paid for education rather than money they’re taking from the poorest. If you pay taxes surely you should be allowed to claim the services you paid for?
The poorest clearly benefit the most. The marginal benefit for the rich is a little bit of money. Not much in terms of their income (the benefit increases as they get less rich of course)
The marginal benefit for those who couldn’t afford to send children to the school is huge. They now have access to an education which previously they did not. That is worth far more than a few thousand pounds saved by a few rich people.

Lastly a note on the popular argument that its immoral for the rich to benefit from tax money.
This is wrong. Morally and practically.
Morally it is wrong because people should be equal under the law. That means the rich are entitled to receive the same benefits from their taxes as the rest of us, including education.
Practically it is wrong because whilst you may succeed in harming the rich a little, as I have demonstrated you harm the poorest most. The benefit from withholding tax benefits from the rich are minuscule compared with the overall benefits.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.